Legal Opinion
Wright v. Randel
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York
Decided August 4, 1881PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBlatcheord, C. J.
On the seventeenth of August, 1875, letters patent No. 166,810 we're issued to the defendant William Randel for an “improvement in button-hole attachments for sewing machines.” Ran-del, by an assignment made September 19, 1876, and recorded September 22, 1876, assigned to Oscar Smith and Benjamin H. Downer each an undivided one-third interest in said patent — ■
“Together with an undivided one-third eaeh of any improvements or new inventions that I have or may produce in button-hole attachments or buttonhole machines, and agree to assign interests as stated above, and make -application for…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gayler v. WilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
3Cited by5 opinions
- Eastern Dynamite Co. v. Keystone Powder Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Pennsylvania · 1908
- Individual Drinking Cup Co. v. Osmun-Cook Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1915
- National Cash Register Co. v. New Columbus Watch Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
- Keystone Type Foundry v. Fastpress Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1919
- Consolidated Rubber Tire Co. v. B. F. Goodrich Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1912