Legal Opinion
S & D Maintenance Co. v. Goldin
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 14, 1988No. 347, Docket 87-7582PublishedCited by 133 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JON 0. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge:
This appeal concerns primarily consideration of the circumstances under which a governmental contract may be said to create a property interest protected by procedural due process. S & D Maintenance Co., Inc. (“S & D”) brought this suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1982), against the City of New York and six City officials,1 alleging a denial of procedural due process in connection with the City’s refusal to pay S & D for services rendered to maintain parking meters. The City had withheld payments to S & D pending a criminal investigation into the circumstances under…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by133 opinions
- Terminate Control Corp. v. HorowitzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Moffitt v. Town Of BrookfieldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Taravella v. Town of WolcottCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Moffitt v. Town of BrookfieldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Allen v. CuomoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.