Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Balodis

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 24, 2000No. 144 M.D. Appeal Docket 1998PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*570 OPINION

CAPPY, Justice.

The question before the court is whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to preserve for appellate review an objection to the admissibility of testimony by the Commonwealth’s expert witness, which improperly bolstered the credibility of the victim. For the following reasons we find that counsel was ineffective, and that accordingly, the decision of the Superior Court must be reversed and the matter remanded for a new trial.

The instant case arose following the allegations of ten year old Jimmy Rosser that he had been sexually molested by appellant on numerous…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Commonwealth v. LantzySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Commonwealth v. DurstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ChambersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. BegleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Commonwealth v. CooperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Commonwealth v. BrooksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Commonwealth v. AliciaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API