Legal Opinion

Broadhurst v. Moenning

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 1994No. 56A05-9304-CV-135PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHARPNACK, Chief Judge.

James G. Broadhurst appeals the trial court's entry of summary judgment in favor of Gainer Bank, N.A. ("the Bank") and Walter P. Moenning. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Broadhurst presents the following restated and renumbered issues for our review:

1. whether Ind.Trial Rule 13(A), which provides for compulsory counterclaims, violates Article I, § 20 of the Indiana Constitution as applied in this case;

2. whether the logical relationship test for determining if a claim is a compulso ry counterclaim under T.R. 18(A) is inadequate;

8. whether the trial court erred in…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Moore v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Rosi v. Business Furniture Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Ayres v. Indian Heights Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Douglass v. IrvinIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Comfax Corp. v. North American Van Lines, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1992

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Mir Iqbal v. Tejaskumar PatelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  2. Ellingstad v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Conk v. RICHARDS & O'NEIL, LLPDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1999
  4. Reichhart v. City of New HavenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Allstate Insurance Co. v. HammondIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API