State v. Morales
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The defendant, Catalino Morales, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered alter a jmy trial, of various criminal offenses. On appeal, the defendant argues that his rights to due process were violated when (1) the trial court improperly allowed testimony regarding evidence that was not preserved by the state and (2) the prosecutor committed misconduct. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. In June, 2001, members of the Connecticut violent crimes fugitive task force received information that the defendant…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. SkakelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. BermudezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. D'HAITYConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- State v. NunezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. PolancoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.