Legal Opinion
State v. Polanco
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 1, 2011No. AC 31516PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, C. J.
The defendant, Carlos Polanco, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after *325a jury trial, of possession of a narcotic substance with intent to sell by a person who is not drug-dependent in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b), possession of a narcotic substance with intent to sell in violation of General Statutes § 2 la-277 (a) and possession of drug paraphernalia in violation of General Statutes § 2 la-267 (a). On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the state violated his right to due process under the Connecticut constitution as a result of the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. AshermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. LeeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- State v. JohnsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- State v. WhiteConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- State v. ArokiumConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- State v. SantosConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.