Legal Opinion

Cugat v. Cugat

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 9, 1951No. Civ. 18176PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANSON, J. pro tem.

The question we are called upon to decide is whether the defendant in a divorce action who was not served with summons and who appeared therein only specially with a motion to vacate certain prior orders entered against him without legal notice thereof may appeal from the order denying his motion.

The orders issued by the court, pursuant to its orders to show cause which were never served upon the defendant, and which were challenged by him upon the ground the court was without jurisdiction to make them, were as follows: (1) An order confirming an ex parte order appointing a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. De la Montanya v. De la MontanyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. Ellis Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lugo v. LugoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. Orloff v. OrloffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API