Gender Machine Works, Inc. v. Eidal International Sales Corp.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.
Defendant Archer Daniels Midland Company (ADM) appeals a summary judgment in favor of plaintiff Gender Machine Works (Gender) in an action for breach of contract. Gender cross-appeals from those aspects of the judgment that reduced its recovery through various offsets. We affirm on the appeal and affirm in part and reverse in part on the cross-appeal.
This case arises from ADM’s purchase of an industrial shredding machine and its alleged erroneous or misdirected payment for that machine. There are three “players”: plaintiff Gender, which was primarily responsible for building the shredder;…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ross v. HardingWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- Badger v. Paulson Investment Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Zehr v. HaugenOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Moser Paper Co. v. North Shore Publishing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Grillo v. Burke's Paint Company, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Blosch v. Natixis Real Estate Capital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- Lee Pacific Properties, Inc. v. Century Pacific Equity Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2015