Blosch v. Natixis Real Estate Capital, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHRISTIANSEN, Judge:
11 Kirk Blosch, Martin W. Merrill, and David O'Bagy appeal from a jury verdict finding that Blosch was not a third-party beneficiary of a loan agreement between Na-tixis Real Estate Capital, Inc. (Natixis), Schoolhouse Downtown, LLC, and Schoolhouse Downtown's principal (Borrower) 1 Blosch also challenges the trial court's denial of his pretrial motion for summary judgment. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
12 On March 30, 2006, Natixis and Borrower entered into a loan agreement (the Loan Agreement) by which Natixis loaned Borrower $7.8 million. 2 The funds were to be used for…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Orvis v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- Daines v. VincentUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- Winegar v. Froerer Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
- Menzies v. GaletkaUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- SME Industries, Inc. v. Thompson, Ventulett, Stainback & Associates, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- A.S. v. R.S.Utah Supreme Court · 2017
- Smith v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- Grove Business Park v. Sealsource InternationalCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
- Myler v. Blackstone Financial Group Business TrustCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014