Legal Opinion

Grillo v. Burke's Paint Company, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1976PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

Plaintiff Grillo, doing business as B-G Paint Co., brought this action for damages against defendant Burke’s Paint Company and defendant E. I. du Pont de Nemours (du Pont). Plaintiff had a contract with the State of Oregon to paint the Youngs Bay bridge in Clatsop County. Plaintiff purchased the paint from defendant Burke’s, who had mixed it according to specifications which had been supplied to Burke’s along with the specified pigment by defendant du Pont. The paint supplied by defendants was defective in that the pigments used were incompatible with each other and the paint turned yellow…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Reese v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Pellett v. Sonotone Corp.California Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Lum v. StinnettNevada Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. OtisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. American Transport Co. v. Central Indiana Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. General Motors Corp. v. SimmonsTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Ratterree v. BartlettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  3. Bohna v. HUGHES, THORSNESS, GANTZAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Cox v. Kelsey-Hayes Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  5. Kippenhan v. Chaulk Services, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API