Childrey v. Rady
Supreme Court of Virginia
Upon petition for a writ of mandamus filed in April, 1883, by John H. Ohildrey and eight others, appointees of the hoard of education for the state, as the school trustees for the city of Richmond, against Charles P. Rady and eight others acting school trustees for the said city. The syllabus indicates and the opinion sufficiently states the facts of the Gase and the positions taken by the petitioners and by the respondents.
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, J.
The petitioners, John H. Childrey, Rowland Hill, Jefferson Powers, John W. Fisher, Richard Forrester, V. A. Favier, Henry Hudnall, R. A. Paul, and J. .V. Reddy, of the city of Richmond, claim that they were, on the 17th day of February, 1883, duly appointed by the board of education for the state of Virginia school trustees for the city of Richmond, and that; they therefore constitute properly the board of school trustees for said city. And said petitioners assert that upon their said appointment they respectively took the oath of office required by the constitution and laws of Virginia, and…
2Cited by7 opinions
- State ex rel. Berge v. LansingNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Sinclair v. YoungSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902
- State ex rel. Gann v. MaloneTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
- Hood v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Owens v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Virginia · 1883
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.