Legal Opinion
Strickland Tower Maintenance, Inc., an Oklahoma Corporation v. At&t Communications, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 4, 1997No. 96-5150, 96-5167PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TACHA, Circuit Judge.
Defendant AT&T Communications, Inc. appeals from an adverse jury verdict and award of attorney’s fees in this contract action. Plaintiff Strickland Tower Management (“STM”) cross appeals for, among other things, prejudgment interest on its damages. We take jurisdiction of this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We now affirm in part and reverse in part.
Background
For 25 years preceding this dispute, STM performed services for AT&T on a number of different contracts. These contracts were STM’s largest source of revenue. From 1988-91, payments from AT&T constituted 90…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Harolds Stores, Inc. v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Merrick v. Northern Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Russell v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- W. R. Grimshaw Company and National Surety Corporation v. Nevil C. Withrow Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Cabot Corp. v. AVX Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
- Gust v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. WellerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Richardson v. Missouri Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Gillogly v. General Electric Capital Assurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.