Legal Opinion

Duncan v. Powers Imports

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 15, 1994No. 82474PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WATT, Justice.

The issue here is whether Claimant, James Randall Duncan, was an employee of Respondent, Powers Imports, or an independent contractor. Following a hearing to determine its jurisdiction, the trial court found that Duncan was an independent contractor. Consequently, the trial court held that it lacked jurisdiction to award workers’ compensation benefits to Duncan. The Court of Appeals reversed on the ground that Duncan was Powers’s employee.

Whether a claimant seeHng workers’ compensation benefits is an employee or an independent contractor is a jurisdictional fact, which we…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Page v. HardySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  2. Mahan v. NTC of America & Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  3. Coleman v. J.C. Penney Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  4. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. BandySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Garrison v. Bechtel Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  2. Carbajal v. Precision Builders, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
  3. Lang v. LanderosCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
  4. City of Tulsa v. Tyson Foods, Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2003
  5. CARBAJAL v. PRECISION BUILDERS, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API