Legal Opinion

United States v. J. Rogers Badgett, Sr., D/B/A Georgetown Apartments Jean Brittain

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 23, 1992No. 91-3458PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEAM, Circuit Judge.

This appeal comes to us from a Fair Housing Act case filed in the district court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. The district court found a housing policy requiring single occupancy for one-bedroom apartments to be facially neutral and therefore not to be a violation of the Fair Housing Act, as amended in 1989. We reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

I. BACKGROUND

Georgetown Apartments, (“Georgetown”), is a 156-unit apartment complex located in Little Rock, Arkansas. J. Rogers Badgett, Sr., (“Badgett”) is the sole owner of Georgetown…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Secretary, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  4. Pollitt v. BramelDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1987
  5. Pinchback v. Armistead Homes Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1988

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Karl Pfaff Elizabeth Pfaff v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  2. Bruce Ring v. First Interstate Mortgage, Inc. Federal National Mortgage AssociationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  3. Omni Behavioral Health v. Steve MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  4. Human Rights Commission v. LaBrie, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  5. Dr. Tadeusz Radecki v. James Joura Carol JouraCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API