Legal Opinion

Meeker v. Board of Commissioners

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1876PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Fountain Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDowney, C. J.

The question as to the correctness of the ruling of the circuit court in dismissing an appeal from the action of the board of commissioners of the county cannot be presented without a bill of exceptions setting forth the ground on .which the circuit court acted. Conoway v. Weaver, 1 Ind. 263; Engard v. Frazier, 7 Ind. 154; Smith v. Smith, 15 Ind. 315; Aspinwall v. The Board of Comm’rs, etc., 18 Ind. 372; Wilson v. Truelock, 19 Ind. 389; Carr v. Thomas, 34 Ind. 292; Burntrager v. McDonald, 34 Ind. 277; Dritt v. Dodds, 35 Ind. 63; Orr v. Worden, 10 Ind. 553.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Conoway v. WeaverIndiana Supreme Court · 1849
  2. Aspinwall v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Orr v. WordenIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Burntrager v. McDonaldIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Carr v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1870

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Crumley v. HickmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Rush v. Foos Manufacturing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. Yost v. ConroyIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API