Legal Opinion

Yost v. Conroy

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1883No. 9991Published

From the Cass Circuit Court.

1Opinion

*473On Petition foe a Rehearing.

Elliott, J.

It is insisted that we did not in the original opinion consider the appellee’s assignment of cross errors, and so far as the fact that we did not consider them is concerned counsel are correct, but in stating that we were bound to consider them counsel are in error. This we say, because the record does not present the questions on which the assignment of cross errors is based. A motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the board of commissioners because of the insufficiency of the appeal bond is not in the record unless carried into it by a bill of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Conoway v. WeaverIndiana Supreme Court · 1849
  2. Scotten v. DivilbissIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Hancock v. FlemingIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Aspinwall v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Lippman v. City of South BendIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API