Rieger v. Wessel
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
STEWART, Judge.
This is an action for a declaration of rights wherein plaintiffs, W. Roy Wessel and Estelle W. Vincent, sought in circuit court to have seven lots owned by them freed from the burden of certain restrictive covenants. The chancellor granted the relief prayed for and adjudged there was no imposition of restrictions upon the lots in controversy. This appeal is from that ruling. We shall refer to the parties throughout as “plaintiffs” and “defendants”.
The case was tried on an agreed statement of facts, a summary of which shows that one Lula Swinney West originally owned two…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sanborn v. McLeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Tallmadge v. . the East River BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Menstell v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1927
- McFarland v. HanleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953
- Greer v. BornsteinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- La Vielle v. SeayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
- Marion Road Assoc. v. HarlowConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983
- Weber v. Les Petite AcademiesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- Campbell v. StoutMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
- Rodgers Et Ux v. Reimann Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1961
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.