Legal Opinion

McConnell v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1978No. L.A. 30795Published

1Opinion of the Court

21 Cal.3d 365 (1978)

578 P.2d 1375

146 Cal. Rptr. 371

JOHN A. McCONNELL et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., Defendant and Appellant.

Docket No. L.A. 30795.

Supreme Court of California.

May 30, 1978.

COUNSEL

Marcus Crahan, Jr., and Jack D. Scott for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Macdonald, Halsted & Laybourne, Peter Brown Doland and Joel Mark for Defendant and Appellant.

OPINION

TOBRINER, J.

Plaintiffs filed a class action against defendant brokerage firm. They alleged, first, that defendant unlawfully charged compound interest on the debit balance in margin…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. La Sala v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Richard Kline v. Coldwell, Banker & Co., RealtorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  4. Lamb v. HerndonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Burr v. Capital Reserve Corp.California Supreme Court · 1969

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API