Legal Opinion
Spanhake v. Teachers' Retirement Board
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 8, 1928PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMerrell, J.
The petitioner applied at Special Term for a peremptory mandamus order directing the respondent herein, the Teachers’ Retirement Board, to pay to the petitioner the sum of $10,000 or the full actuarial value of the retirement allowance due the petitioner’s intestate on August 8, 1927, with interest from that date. The Special Term directed and granted an alternative mandamus order.
The Teachers’ Retirement Law provides two different forms of retirement of teachers. The first of these is authorized by subdivision K of section 1092 of the Greater New York Charter (Laws of 1901, chap. 466), as…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matter of Burr v. . VoorhisNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- People Ex Rel. McMackin v. . Bd. of PoliceNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Eiss v. SummersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- People ex rel. Giles v. Klauder-Weldon Dyeing Machine Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- Poucher v. Teachers' Retirement BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gimprich v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- McEneny v. McKeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Fahey v. WrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Ditchik v. State Board of ParoleNew York Supreme Court · 1943
- Keily v. Teachers' Retirement BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.