Commerce Bank, N.A. v. DiMaria Construction, Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
SKILLMAN, J.A.D.
This appeal requires us to consider the principles which govern the determination of whether a court or arbitrators should decide questions regarding the timeliness of a demand for arbitration or the satisfaction of other conditions of arbitration.
*12In December of 1993, defendant DiMaria Construction, Inc. (DiMaria) entered into two contracts with plaintiff Commerce Bank, N.A. (Commerce) to supervise and manage the construction of interior offices and the installation of heating and air conditioning units in Commerce’s commercial office…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Application of Conticommodity Services Inc., for an Order Restraining Arbitration Attempted to Be Had by Philipp & LionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- McKeown-Brand v. Trump Castle Hotel & CasinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- DiMaria Const., Inc. v. InterarchNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Central Jersey Freightliner, Inc. v. Freightliner Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Di Maria Construction, Inc. v. InterarchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- Gloucester City v. AM. ARBITRATION ASS'N.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
- Galbraith v. Lenape Regional High School DistrictDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.