Culbertson v. Brodsky
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FARRIS, Justice.
Appellants (Culbertson), vendors in a real estate contract, complain of a judgment for specific performance in favor of the purchaser, Brodsky, contending, in part, that the contract was not supported by consideration. We reverse the judgment of the trial court and render judgment for Culbertson because the trial court granted specific performance of an option to purchase which was not supported by consideration from the purchaser.
Brodsky’s suit was based upon a written real estate contract of sale which provided that Brodsky would deliver to Southwest Land Title…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
- Black Lake Pipe Line Co. v. Union Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1976
- Langley v. NorrisTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- Hott v. Pearcy/Christon, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1983
- Baldwin v. New, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Robert Marx and Debbie Marx v. Fdp, Lp, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2015
- Lynx Exploration and Production Co. v. 4-Sight Operating Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1995
- Hughes v. Habitat Apartments, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
- M7 CAPITAL LLC v. Miller, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
- Aaron Chevalier v. W.M. Roberson, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.