Legal Opinion

Hughey v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided March 5, 1963No. Civ. A. No. 2380PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEAHY, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiff alleges he is covered by an automobile liability policy issued by defendant insurance company. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment was denied.1 Defendant now moves for dismissal, pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 17(a) claiming plaintiff is not the “real party in interest” in the case or, in the alternative, for relief under F.R.C.P. 19 and 21, joining the Phoenix Assurance Company of New York (henceforth “Phoenix”) as a party plaintiff. Plaintiff was involved in an automobile accident; his losses have been fully repaid by his personal insurer, Phoenix. He now…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Gas Service Co. v. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  5. Frank C. Sparks Co. v. Huber Baking Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Oliver B. Cannon & Son, Inc. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1981
  2. International Rediscount Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
  3. See v. Emhart Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1977
  4. Hughey v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API