Legal Opinion

Berneche v. Hilliard

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 21, 1907No. Nos. 15,177-(93)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Action in the district court for St. Louis county to recover $10,000 for personal injuries. The case was tried before Ensign, J., and a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $1,500. Erom an order denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of defendant. Plaintiff had a verdict, and defendant appealed from an order denying his alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.

The main facts leading up to the injury complained of are as follows: Defendant was engaged in the construction of a building for the Northern Power Company at Duluth. In connection with the work he employed several crews of men and laborers, among them a crew engaged in operating a derrick, used in lifting and placing in position heavy articles of building material.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jemming v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  2. O'Niel v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  3. Barrett v. ReardonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  4. Doerr v. Daily News Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  5. Lake Superior Produce & Cold Storage Co. v. Concordia Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Pittsburgh Coal Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  2. Lohman v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  3. Aho v. Adriatic Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  4. Dizonno v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  5. Lincoln Traction Co. v. Omaha, Lincoln & Beatrice Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API