Legal Opinion
Howard v. Chester Cnty. Office of Juvenile Prob.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 15, 2019No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-2209PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Rufe, District Judge.
Plaintiff Harold Howard, proceeding pro se , asserts constitutional, statutory, and common law claims against Defendants based on their alleged failure to adequately notify Plaintiff of the complaint made against his then-minor son after his son damaged a car, and Defendants' use of private information related to his son's alleged disability during the resulting juvenile proceedings. All Defendants have moved to dismiss Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint.1 Each of these motions to dismiss, except for the School District's motion, has been converted to a motion for…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Benjamin J. Rusnak and Ashley N. Rusnak, in their own right, C.R., a Minor, by and through his parents v. Wilson School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
- Darius L. Harris v. Garrett Trent, et al.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
- MOORE v. STONEDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- SINANAN v. CHILDREN, YOUTH & FAMILIES DIVISION, COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON, GOVERNMENT AGENCYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024