United States v. Hillian

Randall Eugene Hillian appeals his sentence imposed following this court’s remand for resentencing. See United States v. Hillian, 210 F. App’x 251 (4th Cir.2006) (unpublished). Finding no error, we affirm.

On appeal, counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), asserting there are no meritorious grounds for appeal, but questioning whether the sentence is reasonable. In his pro se supplemental brief, Hillian joins his counsel in arguing that the sentence is unreasonable. Hillian additionally contends that 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) (2000),…