Legal Opinion

United States v. Hillian

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided December 19, 2006No. 04-4729UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Randall Eugene Hillian appeals his conviction and 120-month sentence imposed after a jury found him guilty of being a convicted felon in possession of a firearm, 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) & 924(a)(2) (2000). For the reasons stated below, we affirm Hillian’s conviction, but vacate his sentence and remand for resentencing.

Hillian claims error in the district court’s refusal to instruct the jury on the defense of justification in regard to his possession of a firearm. To establish a justification defense, the defendant must show that: (1) he was under unlawful and present threat of death or serious…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. RicksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. HillianCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API