California Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission v. Bonneville Power Administration
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Sneed, Circuit Judge:
Petitioner California Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (CEC) challenges transactions between the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and two northwest electric utilities that took place in 1983. Petitioner seeks a declaratory judgment that the transactions constituted a sale of electric power by BPA at a rate below that authorized by the established rate structure, and that BPA was therefore required to undertake statutorily-mandated ratemaking proceedings before entering into the transactions.
We find that, under the circumstances of this case,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Gulf States Utilities Co. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Joseph B. Williams and Leo Bazille v. Joseph L. AliotoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Portland General Electric Company v. Peter Johnson, Administrator of the Bonneville Power Administration, Intalco Aluminum Corporation, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
3Cited by29 opinions
- Sample v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Sample v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Public Utility Commissioner Of Oregon v. Bonneville Power AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Alcoa, Inc. v. Bonneville Power AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Department of Water and Power of the City of Los Angeles v. Bonneville Power AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.