Murray v. Murray Et Ux.
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
PARKER, C. J.
The appellee (plaintiff) brought an action for damages against appellants (defendants.) for the alienation of plaintiff’s husband, and recovered a verdict and judgment for $12,500. The defendants are the father and mother of plaintiff’s husband. Counsel for defendants argue that there was not sufficient legal evidence to support the verdict.
1. It is first urged that the gist of the action for the alienation of the affections of a spouse is the loss of consortium. It is then argued, quoting from the testimony of the plaintiff, that she had already herself…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State ex rel. School District v. GordonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- Cornelius v. CorneliusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
- Fuller v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
- Perry v. LoyejoyMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Jameson v. TullyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Roseberry v. StarkovichNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Lacy v. G.D. Searle & Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1984
- Worth v. WorthWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
- Worth v. WorthWyoming Supreme Court · 1937