Legal Opinion

Weiss v. Northern Dredge & Dock Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 24, 1928No. [No. 14, April Term, 1928.]PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwutt, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Baltimore City Court on a directed verdict for the defendant in the short note case of a non-resident attachment proceeding instituted by Bernard M. Weiss against the Korthern Dredge and Dock Company to recover compensation for services which he claimed to have rendered it, in onnection with the sale of its dredge the “Patuxent”.

The Korthem Dredge and Dock Company, hereinafter referred to as the “Dock Company,” was in 1925 and 1926 engaged in business as a dredging contractor, and in connection with that business it owned several dredges, one of which,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. LaForce v. Washington UniversityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. Mayor of Baltimore v. TerioCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  3. Boyd v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
  4. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. WalshCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1923
  5. Caltrider v. WeantCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Baltimore Luggage Co. v. LigonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
  2. Hughes v. AverzaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  3. National Micrographics Systems, Inc. v. Oce-Industries, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  4. Lawson v. ClawsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
  5. Close v. RedeliusNevada Supreme Court · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API