Amgen, Inc. v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
YOUNG, Chief Judge.
INTRODUCTORY NOTE: On September 18, 2003, this Court held that Amgen had successfully rebutted the presumption of prosecution history es-toppel but noted that it might have to revisit the issue if the Federal Circuit’s Festo opinion was published before this Court’s opinion was finished. 9/18/03 Pretrial Conference Tr. at 7, 11. 17-25, and 8,11. 1-5. This Court had scheduled release of this opinion for early October, 2003, pending final proofreading. The Federal Circuit released its opinion in Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., Ltd.,…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Amgen v. Hoechst Marion Roussel (Now Known as Aventis Pharmaceuticals)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Delaventura v. Columbia Acorn TrustDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
- Amgen, Inc. v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
- Ambit Corp. v. Delta Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
- NewRiver, Inc. v. NEWKIRK PRODUCTS, INC.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.