Ambit Corp. v. Delta Airlines, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
YOUNG, District Judge.
I. PRIOR PROCEEDINGS
On January 22, 2010, this Court denied the motion of Delta Airlines, Inc., and Aircell LLC (“Delta”) for summary judgment that Patent No. 7,400,858 (the “'858 Patent”) is invalid as obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103 and notified the parties that it was considering granting summary judgment sua sponte on that issue for AMBIT Corp. (“Ambit”). Order Den. Mot. Summ. J., Jan. 22, 2010 [Doc. No. 135], Subsequently, Delta filed an opposition arguing not only that its December 22, 2009, submission, which relied on a 1993 paper by A.C.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. MassachusettsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
- Rothschild v. Cree, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
- Aspex Eyewear, Inc. v. Altair Eyewear, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
- Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- Susan Scubla v. New Rez, LLCBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.