Legal Opinion
Amgen v. Hoechst Marion Roussel (Now Known as Aventis Pharmaceuticals)
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 3, 2006No. 2005-1157PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge SCHALL.
Dissenting-in-part opinion filed by Chief Judge MICHEL.
SCHALL, Circuit Judge.
This is a patent case. Amgen, Inc. (“Amgen”) is the owner of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,547,933 (“the ’933 patent”), 5,618,-698 (“the ’698 patent”), 5,621,080 (“the ’080 patent”), 5,756,349 (“the ’349 patent”), and 5,955,422 (“the ’422 patent”). The patents are directed to recombinant deoxyribonu-cleic acid (“DNA”) technology relating to the production of the hormone erythro-poietin (“EPO”). All five patents share a common specification and descend from Application No.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Innova/pure Water, Inc. v. Safari Water Filtration Systems, Inc. (Doing Business as Safari Outdoor Products)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. AbbVie IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Sanofi-Synthelabo v. Apotex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Allergan Sales, LLC v. Sandoz, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Forest Laboratories, Inc. v. Ivax Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.