Legal Opinion

Hanquet v. Department of Labor & Industries

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 6, 1994No. 31336-3-IPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.

The Department of Labor and Industries (the Department) denied Frederic Hanquet’s claim for workers’ compensation benefits on the basis that he was a sole proprietor, not a worker. The Board of Industrial Insurance Appeals (the Board) reversed that determination, but denied the claim on the basis of a different exclusion. The Superior Court, upon Hanquet’s further appeal, entered judgment denying his claim on both grounds. We reverse the Superior Court’s judgment denying Hanquet’s claim and hold (1) both the Board and the Superior Court erred by considering an exclusion which was beyond the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. White v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Leary v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Lenk v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  4. Brakus v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Garrett Freightlines, Inc. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ruse v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Kingery v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Kingery v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Cantu v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  5. Cantu v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API