Legal Opinion

Crowder Construction Company v. Kiser

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 20, 1999No. COA98-949PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, Judge.

Kiser contends that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment for the Company because (I) there were genuine issues of material fact as to whether plaintiff correctly determined the “adjusted book value” of Kiser’s stock as required by the 1991 Agreement; (II) enforcement of the 1991 Agreement would be “unconscionable under the circumstances”; and (III) there are genuine issues of material fact as to equitable defenses to specific performance raised by Kiser. After careful consideration of each issue raised by defendant, we disagree and affirm the judgment of the trial…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Meiselman v. MeiselmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Brenner v. Little Red School House, Ltd.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Gallagher v. LambertNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Adder v. Holman & Moody, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. Chul Yun KimSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Lucas v. Swain County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Conleys Creek Ltd. P'ship v. Smoky Mountain Country Club Prop. Owners Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  3. Maurer v. Slickedit, Inc.North Carolina Business Court · 2005
  4. Mechanical Sys. & Serv., Inc. v. Carolina Air Solutions, L.L.C.North Carolina Business Court · 2003
  5. Lynd v. Marshall Cnty. Pediatrics, P.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2018

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API