Legal Opinion
Vacation Village, Inc. v. Clark County, Nev
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 10, 2007No. 05-16173, 05-16389, 05-16406, 05-16554. Adv. No. 98-2313-RCJPublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed on July 23, 2007 at slip op. 8849 is hereby AMENDED as follows:
Delete the paragraph at slip op. 8861 beginning “The Rooker-Feldman doctrine holds that” and the paragraph at slip op. 8861-62 beginning “Here, the state court stated” and replace with:
“The Rooker-Feldman doctrine ... is confined to ... cases brought by state court losers complaining of injuries caused by state-court judgments rendered before the district court proceedings commenced and inviting district court review and rejection of those judgments.” Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Indus., 544 U.S. 280,…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- RR Street & Co. Inc. v. Transport Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Deitz v. FordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- McClung v. City of SumnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Huy Thanh Vo v. Nelson & KennardDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
- Field v. Lindell (In Re the Mortgage Store, Inc.)District Court, D. Hawaii · 2011
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.