Legal Opinion

Herman v. Bonanza Buildings, Inc.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1986No. 85-207PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

Appellants, Albert and Mildred Herman, husband and wife, sued appellee, Bonanza Buildings, Inc., for damages resulting from the improper erection by Big Valley Builders, Inc., of a •steel building, the components of which were manufactured and supplied by Bonanza. The operative petition alleges that Big Valley is the agent of Bonanza, rendering the latter liable for the defects in Big Valley’s workmanship, and that Bonanza breached certain warranties it made directly to the Hermans. Trial was had without a jury. At the close of the Hermans’ evidence, the trial court dismissed the suit…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Erspamer Advertising Co. v. Department of LaborNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Maricle v. SpiegelNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Mennonite Deaconess Home & Hospital, Inc. v. Gates Engineering Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. In Re Estate of PriceNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Reeves v. Assoc. Financial Services Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Spelts-Schultz Lumber Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Myszkowski v. Penn Stroud Hotel, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Delicious Foods Co. v. Millard Warehouse, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Tiede v. Loup Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Moglia v. McNeil Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API