Legal Opinion

Erspamer Advertising Co. v. Department of Labor

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1983No. 82-421PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoslaugh, J.

The Department of Labor has appealed from the judgment of the District Court reversing the determination by the Nebraska Appeal Tribunal that Richard G. Paulson, a salesman of advertising specialties for the appellee, Erspamer Advertising Company (Erspamer), was an employee.

In October 1980 Richard G. Paulson entered into a “salesman agreement” with Erspamer, a company which sells advertising specialties. The contract provided that (1) Erspamer could designate the *69salesman’s territory; (2) compensation was to be on a commission basis only; (3) commissions were payable on a monthly basis and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. The People v. HairstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Washington Recorder Publishing Co. v. ErnstWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Maricle v. SpiegelNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Lincoln Woman's Club v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Stephens v. Celeryvale Transport, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. State v. JoubertNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Muller v. ThautNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. AtkinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Nelson v. DolanNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Metro Renovation, Inc. v. State Department of LaborNebraska Supreme Court · 1996

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API