Legal Opinion
Frankle v. Twedt
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 20, 1951No. 35,353Published
1Opinion of the Court
234 Minn. 42 (1951)
CLARENCE FRANKLE
v.
HERMAN S. TWEDT.[1]
No. 35,353.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
April 20, 1951.
Faegre & Benson and Raymond Scallen, for appellant.
Robins, Davis & Lyons and Hyman H. Cohen, for respondent.
MATSON, JUSTICE.
Appeal by defendant from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
As an outgrowth of a collision at East Seventh street and Forest avenue in St. Paul, plaintiff sued for damages to his automobile, and defendant answered and counterclaimed for damages to his vehicle. At the time of the accident, plaintiff's foster brother, Harold Schmit, was driving plaintiff's…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. RahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Christensen v. Hennepin Transportation Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Frankle v. TwedtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Olson v. Trinity Lodge No. 282, A. F. A. M.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Curcic v. Nelson Display Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.