Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hanks v. Norfolk & Western R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 30, 1949Published

1DissentEbviN, J.

The defendant reserved exceptions to the exclusion of its Exhibits A, B, C, D, E, E, and G, and is now awarded a new trial by the majority of this Court on the specific basis that the rejection of Exhibits A, D, E, E, and G constituted error. I cannot agree with this decision.

It is a fundamental rule of appellate practice that a judgment will he upheld on appeal unless the appellant shows affirmatively by the record that some reversible, material, substantial, or prejudicial error was committed by the lower court. S. v. Gibson, 229 N.C. 497, 50 S.E. 2d 520; Roberts v. Bus Co., 198 N.C. 779,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. State v. . GibsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Cooper v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Coach Co. v. . LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Carter v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  5. Hicks v. . Love and Bruton v. . LoveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API