Legal Opinion
B. Sanfield, Inc. v. Finlay Fine Jewelry Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 5, 1998No. 93 C 20149PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
REINHARD, District Judge.
Plaintiff, B. Sanfield, Inc., filed a three-count, second amended complaint alleging a false advertising claim under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), a false advertising claim under the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (Consumer Fraud Act) 815 ILCS § 505/2, and a claim for punitive damages under the Consumer Fraud Act against defendant, Finlay Fine Jewelry Corp. based on certain advertisements by defendant of fine jewelry at 50% off the regular price. 1 The court conducted a bench trial pursuant to Rule 52(a)…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. Mead Johnson & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Siegel v. Levy Organization Development Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Basf Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Old World Trading Company, Incorporated, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Washington Courte Condominium Association-Four v. WASHINGTON-GOLF CORPORATIONAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Garcia v. Overload Bond & Investment Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- B. Sanfield, Inc. v. Finlay Fine Jewelry Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- B. Sanfield, Incorporated v. Finlay Fine Jewelry CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- B. Sanfield, Inc. v. Finlay Fine Jewelry Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
- B. Sanfield, Inc v. Finlay Fine JewelryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001