Legal Opinion

Strickler's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 27, 1937No. Appeals, 37-39PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

These three appeals were argued together. In number 37 appellant complains that the learned court refused to hold the bank liable for breach of trust; in numbers 38 and 39, the complaint is that certain notes were held to be valid claims against the decedent’s estate.

On the death of Mary D. Striekler letters testamentary were granted November 5,1930, to Second National Bank of Uniontown, hereafter referred to as the bank, and to her son and daughter, Edgar E. Striekler and Eugenia S. Miller. Decedent left income producing real estate for which there was no immediate…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Tracy, Co-Trustees v. Central Tr. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. J. W. O'Bannon Co. v. CurranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  3. Linthicum v. BagbyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
  4. MacDougall v. Citizens National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  5. Bessenger v. WenzelMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DeMarcoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Earll v. PickenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  3. Strickler's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Chalupiak v. StahlmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Chalupiak v. StahlmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API