Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Kinsky v. Pratte

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 15, 1999No. 76053PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, Presiding Judge.

Petitioner seeks to prohibit enforcement of an order of Respondent quashing the Notice of Deposition in a criminal case. Petitioner has no adequate remedy by way of appeal to challenge Respondent’s order. The Court has received and considered the petition, suggestions in support of the petition, and copies of the information, the state’s Request for Disclosure, Defendant’s Response Thereto, the state’s Notice of Deposition, Defendant’s Motion to Quash Notice of Deposition, the state’s Amended Notice of Deposition, and docket sheet reflecting the trial…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ostermueller v. PotterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. State v. OwensSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  3. Marriage of Chastain v. ChastainSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  4. Berdella v. PenderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  5. State v. ReeseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. STATE EX REL. MISSOURI PUBLIC DEFENDER COMM'N. v. PratteSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  2. State v. BryanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. State v. BechholdMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Lorenzini v. ShortMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. State ex rel. Missouri Public Defender Commission v. PratteSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API