Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Missouri Public Defender Commission v. Pratte

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 8, 2009No. Nos. SC 89882, SC 90195PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MICHAEL A. WOLFF, Judge.

Introduction

These writ proceedings raise the question of the role of the courts, the public defender commission and the legal profession in fulfilling Missouri’s constitutional obligation to provide attorneys to represent indigent defendants facing incarceration for their alleged crimes.

There is an apocryphal story in legal circles that a well-known prosecutor some years ago voiced his support for the state to provide attorneys for those accused of serious crimes, noting that without legal representation, an accused cannot be tried: “I can’t fry 'em if I can’t try 'em.”

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. STATE EX REL. MISSOURI PUBLIC DEFENDER COMM'N. v. PratteSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  2. Elke Crump and Steven Michael Perry v. Margarete Frenk, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2013
  3. STATE OF MISSOURI EX REL. BRIAN GLENN FLETCHER, Relator v. THE HONORABLE DAVID COLEMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. State ex rel. Jones v. HoldenMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API