Tuong Huan Van Dinh v. Reno
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs-appellants appeal from the district court’s denial of attorney’s fees and costs for which they applied pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A). 1 Our jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Because we conclude that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over appellants’ underlying Bivens 2 class action suit, we remand for entry of an order dismissing the case with prejudice. 3
I. Background Facts and Procedures
Plaintiff Tuong Huan Van Dinh 4 is an alien who had permanent resident alien status until he was…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Schweiker v. ChilickySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- MacKey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- Yu Zhao v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Aguilar v. United States Immigration & Customs Enforcement Division of the Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Hakim Iddir v. Immigration And Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Mohammed Nasir Khan v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Marvin Miranda v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.