Legal Opinion

Parker v. Bowron

California Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1953No. L. A. 22294Published

1Opinion of the Court

40 Cal.2d 344 (1953)

LESTER A. PARKER et al., Appellants,

v.

FLETCHER BOWRON, as Mayor of the City of Los Angeles et al., Respondents.

L. A. No. 22294.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Mar. 6, 1953.

David Sokol and Clarence E. Todd for Appellants.

Ray L. Chesebro, City Attorney (Los Angeles), Bourke Jones, Assistant City Attorney, George William Adams, Alan G. Campbell and John F. Feldmeier, Deputy City Attorneys, for Respondents.

EDMONDS, J.

The purpose of this mandate proceeding is to compel the respondent city officials to fix a salary or wage for all of the city's employees in certain…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Douglas v. City of JeannetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Klopstock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API