Legal Opinion

Dillon v. Seattle Police Pension Board

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 28, 1996No. 36242-9-IPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEllington, J.

Timothy Dillon appeals the Superior Court’s order affirming the Seattle Police Pension Board decision that his mental disability was not "incurred in the line of duty.” Dillon argues the Superior Court erred when it affirmed the Board’s decision because the Board incorrectly applied the law and its decision was not supported by substantial evidence. We agree the Board’s decision is not supported by substantial evidence and reverse.

Dillon was a police officer with the Seattle Police Department. While off duty in 1985, he shot himself in the hand while cleaning his gun. As a result of his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dennis v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Hilltop Terrace Homeowner's Ass'n v. Island CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. MaxfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. McClelland v. ITT Rayonier, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  5. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. McDowellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ruse v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Washington Public Employees Ass'n v. Washington Personnel Resources BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  3. Mansour v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  4. In re Pera Police & Fire Plan Line of Duty Disability Benefits of BrittainSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  5. Davis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API