People v. Collins
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GEORGE, C. J.
In this case we must determine the validity of a criminal defendant’s waiver of a jury trial, when the trial court, in advising the defendant before accepting the waiver, informed him that he would receive “some benefit” if he waived his right to a jury trial, although the court could not specify what the benefit would be. The Court of Appeal, in a divided decision, determined that the jury waiver obtained under these circumstances was valid. We conclude that the waiver of a jury trial obtained by a trial court’s assurance of an unspecified benefit is not a valid waiver,…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- People v. JuradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. CunninghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- People v. SivongxxayCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- People v. FarwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- Balbosa v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.