Legal Opinion
Brownlow v. Edgcomb Metals Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided November 3, 1983No. C83-361PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BATTISTI, Chief Judge.
The question in this case is whether Ohio is now a “deferral state” within the meaning of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq. For the reasons outlined below, the Court holds that Ohio qualifies as a deferral state under 29 U.S.C. § 633(b), and as such deny defendant Edgcomb Metals Company’s (Edgcomb) motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
Edgcomb has moved under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) to dismiss plaintiff Brownlow’s complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Edward E. Westlake v. William Lucas, Sheriff of Wayne CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Oscar Mayer & Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Fawcett v. G. C. Murphy & Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nolan v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- Perazzo v. Top Value Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1984
- Dunn v. Medina General HospitalDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1996
- Piecuch v. Gulf & Western Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1985