Legal Opinion
Texas Workers' Compensation Commission The Subsequent Injury Fund And Leonard W. Riley, Jr. v. Continental Casualty Company
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided August 8, 2002No. 03-01-00510-CVPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MACK KIDD, Justice.
Continental Casualty Company filed this declaratory judgment action 1 seeking an interpretation of provisions of the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act against the Texas Workers’ Compensation Commission (the “Commission”) and the Subsequent Injury Fund (the “Fund”) (collectively, the “Commission”). 2 This case involves a dispute between Continental and the Commission, which is charged with administering the state workers’ compensation fund, over the interpretation of statutory provisions requiring the Commission to reimburse insurers for benefits paid to claimants pursuant to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Fitzgerald v. Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
- RepublicBank Dallas, N.A. v. Interkal, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Kroger Co. v. KengTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Continental Casualty Co. v. DownsTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Bragg v. Edwards Aquifer AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Hageman/Fritz, Byrne, Head & Harrison, L.L.P. v. Luth, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
- Wesco Distribution, Inc. v. Westport Group, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
- Laura Beeman and Janet Lock v. Brad Livingston, in His Official Capacity as Executive Director of the Texas Department of Criminal JusticeTexas Supreme Court · 2015
- Centerpoint Energy Entex v. Railroad Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
- State v. Chacon, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2008
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.