Legal Opinion
Barrett N. Weinberger v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 5, 2001No. 99-4553PublishedCited by 144 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBoggs, J.
COHN, D.J. (pp. 362-64), delivered a separate concurring opinion. MOORE, J. (pp. 364-67), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.
OPINION
BOGGS, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner-appellant, Barrett N. Wein-berger, a disbarred lawyer acting pro se, appeals a decision of the district court denying his motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. For the following reasons, we affirm in part and reverse in part.
I
In 1989, Weinberger began doing legal work for Dorette K. Fleischmann; her daughter, Joan Fleischmann Tobin; and, after Dorette’s death, the Dorette K.…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- David Foster and Catherine Foster v. Sigmund Barilow and Margaret BarilowCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Daryl E. Ratliff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by144 opinions
- Robert Moss (99-1951 01-1797) and Ronald Kohn (01-1610) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Donald Mallett, Petitioner/defendant-Appellant v. United States of America, Respondent/plaintiff-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Jimmy Ray Valentine (04-2116) Kenneth Jerome Valentine (05-1877) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. David Devon DavisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Seth MurdockCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
139 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.